Total
failure of FTAA inevitable
EXPERTS from a number of
countries announced the inevitable end of the FTAA during the
4th Hemispheric Conference against the Free Trade Area of the
Americas, inaugurated yesterday in the presence of Cuban
President Fidel Castro.
It will disappear with shame
and without glory, affirmed Cuban economist Osvaldo Martínez.
He affirmed that a year of
stagnation in negotiations and the strength of social movements
highlight the rejection of the planned agreement, which he
qualified as a neoliberal monster promoted by the United States.
Even while some submissive
governments in the region are scheming to bring about the
success of new attempts at domination in Latin America and the
Caribbean, the defeat of those plans is inexorably approaching.
Martínez explained that the
failure of the FTAA is due to the fact that it is incompatible
with national self-determination of the peoples.
The Cuban economist gave the
opening address to the forum in Havana, attended by more than
960 delegates from 36 countries.
He affirmed that before the
moment of the FTAA’s collapse arrives, its US promoters are
directing their efforts towards the approval of bilateral free
trade treaties, with stronger doses of neoliberalism.
The current situation of those
attempts is also marked by the trade inequalities that the U.S.
is trying to impose on the FTAA, as well as mass protests
against agricultural subsidies, which are not included in
negotiations on the trade agreements.
Regarding that issue,
Venezuelan economist Edgardo Lander emphasized its importance
for the region’s economies and agriculture – primarily
subsistence – which are being affected by an avalanche of US
products.
A particular target of
criticism was the absence of the foreign debt in all discussions
and documents related to the FTAA. In the region, that debt
reaches $723 million, and is under constant negotiation under
the precepts of the International Monetary Fund and the World
Trade Organization (WTO).
The latter was the subject of a
panel discussion during the forum, which analyzed the need to
establish a strategy of struggle to reject that agency’s
expansionist and neoliberal intentions.
A number of speakers agreed
that a victory against the WTO could be possible via the
positive experiences of Latin American countries against the
FTAA.
Deborah James of the U.S. and
the Hemispheric Social Alliance, stated that during the 10 years
of the WTO’s existence, advances have been slow, and she
recalled its failed negotiations during its meetings in Seattle
and Cancún.
Limiting the WTO’s
possibilities, so that it cannot dominate agreements related to
the control of agriculture, intellectual property and the
privatization of services are goals of this battle, affirmed
Pablo Solón, of the Bolivian Movement against the FTAA.
The WTO, an emblematic
institution of the neoliberal world economic order, is utilized
by the United States so that its mechanisms of domination will
prevail in Latin America, under the false pretext of free trade.
Such arguments are necessary to
consolidate confronting the WTO before its ministerial meeting,
scheduled for December in Hong Kong.
The 4th Hemispheric Conference
against the FTAA, which continues until next Saturday, has a
special session planned for Friday dedicated to the Bolivarian
Alternative for the Americas (ALBA), promoted by the governments
of Venezuela and Cuba. (PL).